 |
John's Effect on Jesus
The readings for Sunday, December 7, 2003, the Second Sunday of Advent,
are Baruch 5:1-9, Philippians 1:4-6, 8-11 and Luke 3:1-6.
Have you noticed? Each of the four gospels starts in a unique way. Matthew,
Mark, Luke and John begin their salvation-narratives from different points.
The way the writer introduces his Gospel gives us a hint about the theology
he’s going to develop. Yet, no matter what their theology, all four
evangelists tie the beginning of Jesus’ ministry to John the Baptizer’s
ministry. What Jesus said and did had its roots in what John said and
did.
The strange unkempt prophet who came out of the Judean wilderness and
disturbed the Jewish establishment probably never conceived of his ministry
as predicting the coming of Jesus, the Messiah. And Jesus, the Galilean
carpenter, didn’t follow John because he pointed the crowds in his
direction. The theology which paints John as knowing he’s Jesus’
precursor was created by Jesus’ disciples after his death and resurrection.
Before those two life-giving events took place, Jesus’ followers
would have regarded John as the historical Jesus regarded John: as a prophetic
reformer of Judaism. It was the same role Jesus accepted after John was
stopped from exercising it.
John and Jesus judged their callings to be in the line of the great Jewish
prophets who preceded them. John, for instance, isn’t the first
prophet to use Isaiah’s words about Israel’s return to Jerusalem
from the Babylonian Exile. A century before, Baruch reminds his people
that “... God has commanded that every lofty mountain be made low,
and that the age-old depths and gorges be filled to level ground, that
Israel may advance secure in the glory of God.”
Of course, Luke’s John says nothing about the security of Israel’s
“advance” in today’s Gospel pericope. Like Jesus, he’s
simply concerned with “all people (seeing) the salvation of God.”
This seems to be why Luke mentions that John “... went about the
entire region of the Jordan proclaiming a baptism of repentance which
led to the forgiveness of sins.” All prophets demand repentance
— a new way of looking at reality. For John (and Jesus), when someone
takes that one hundred eighty degree turn in his or her value system,
they become someone so different and new that any sins they committed
based on their old value system are automatically washed away; an event
symbolized by their acceptance of baptism.
Carrying on this prophetic tradition of repentance, Paul reminds Christians
in Philippi about their own repentance, and prays that it will continue
to grow. “My prayer,” he writes, “is that your love
may more and more abound, both in understanding and wealth of experience,
so that with a clear conscience and blameless conduct you may learn to
value the things that really matter, up to the very day of Christ.”
Though unlike John’s disciples, Christians are baptized just once,
Paul believes their repentance is an ongoing process; they’re always
discovering new faith angles from which to view what’s happening
around them.
The historical Jesus became John’s disciple only because this wilderness
prophet offered the most insightful process of repentance he’d experienced
to that point of his life. Though it’s important to have and reflect
on the traditional “precursor” model of John, it’s just
as important to have and reflect on Jesus’ evaluation of him. John’s
insistence on experiencing God present and working among us deepened Jesus’
faith and became the most important part of the message he would later
pass on to his own followers.
Of course, only those who dare to look at John from a different angle
than the one from which we’ve traditionally observed him, will be
able to “repent” enough to appreciate both John’s historical
ministry and the effect it had on Jesus.
|